Teaching / provisional teaching
Keep What Can Correct You
A strong experience should remain answerable to trusted people, tested texts, conduct, ordinary duties, clinical boundaries, or time.
At a glance
Do not rush to make a strong experience mean what you want it to mean. Keep the experience close and the judgment open. Let conduct, trusted people, durable texts, clinical boundaries, ordinary duties, and time keep the interpretation honest. Correction is not an enemy of insight.
Human problem
What this is for
Private certainty after intense practice, isolation, spiritual inflation, fear, and unsupported interpretation.
Practice implication
What changes
Name the correction path before you lean harder on an experience or support.
Danger
How it can go wrong
Correction language can become dependency or shame if no safe corrector is available.
Deepening
The living version
The corpus distinguishes conduct correction from meaning correction: many people can correct how you live, but only a shared world can correct what an experience means.
Supporting Findings
Candidate Trail
Related Practices
Tests
What should pressure this truth
- Separate conduct correction from meaning correction in practice reports.
- Test whether naming reachable correction reduces isolation without increasing dependency.
Source Basis
- Teaching Keep What Can Correct You.
- Teaching Two Kinds of Correction.
- Codex and Claude dialogue records on recognition and correction.
Common Questions
Is this final teaching?
No. This is a provisional teaching: one of the strongest carried truths in the current corpus, still answerable to sources, tests, trials, and human challenge.
Why is this a Teaching?
It compresses many findings and candidate records into one scarce truth that changes care, conduct, practice, or testing.
What would change it?
Separate conduct correction from meaning correction in practice reports.